Search for: "State v. Levinson"
Results 81 - 100
of 460
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2018, 4:05 am
(Mark Graber, Sanford Levinson, Mark Tushnet, eds., Oxford University Press, 2018 Forthcoming)).Marie T. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 9:30 pm
“Retired Oregon State University professor of history William G. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
, Brief of Amici Curiae Legal Scholars in Support of Equality in Support of Respondents, Fulton v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
Starger, A Visual Guide to United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 5:27 am
In Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Existing democracies are fragile.[3] That includes the United States. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 8:02 am
,” about the pros and cons of calls for an Article V amendments convention. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 2:28 pm
The Constitution of the United States, supporters profess, is not really as bad as Levinson would have us believe. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
On the state level, formal constitutional change is persistent and ongoing. [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:04 am
Casey v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:04 am
Casey v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 2:07 am
Here is the opinion: Vindman v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:48 am
United States and Black v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:52 am
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988). [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:00 am
To mark this celebration of Sandy’s 40 years at the University of Texas, I want to argue that constitutional faith provides a path back to democracy in the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:45 am
In Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 10:25 am
A few days ago, Professor Sandy Levinson argued on this blog that to believe the ERA would pass, one would have to believe Congress has no power to set time limits for amendments and that states cannot rescind their ratifications. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 6:28 am
” Lawson v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 11:30 am
Law Offices of Barry Levinson v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:02 am
We have started posting the hordes of memos in our “Securities Litigation” Practice Area, but here’s analysis from Skadden: The Supreme Court of the United States today in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
