Search for: "State, Child Support Enforcement Agency v. Doe"
Results 81 - 100
of 528
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2022, 6:43 am
After overwhelming support in the state legislature, Connecticut is about to become the fifth state with a comprehensive privacy law, as SB 6 awaits signature by Governor Ned Lamont. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court ruled, in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 4:47 am
Ed. 2d 831; United States v Gorrell, 360 F Supp 2d 48, 55 n 5 [“The warrant did not limit the amount of time in which the government was required to complete its off-site forensic analysis of the seized items and the courts have not imposed such a prophylactic constraint on law enforcement”]; United States v Triumph Capital Group, Inc., 211 FRD 31, 66 [the Fourth Amendment does not “impose any time limitation on the… [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 2:07 pm
Such is the case in Ninestar Corporation et al. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 6:48 pm
The act also requires prompt sharing of information on registered sex offenders among state, local and federal law enforcement agencies and other entities.Grant Programs AuthorizedThe Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 authorizes a Sex Offender Management Assistance grant program to help states implement and comply with the law, with bonus payments for substantial implementation within two years of the Act. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:44 am
Yet she never complained to a law enforcement officer or social services agency about mistreatment. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:43 am
The Support Magistrate directed the mother to pay child support of $464 per month. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am
Obrey v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1584 concerns an appeal against an Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) decision which set aside the findings of the First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) that Reg. 7(17), Housing Benefit Regulations 2006, breached Art. 14 ECHR (although not expressly set out in the Judgment, presumably in conjunction with A1P1). [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am
Obrey v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1584 concerns an appeal against an Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) decision which set aside the findings of the First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) that Reg. 7(17), Housing Benefit Regulations 2006, breached Art. 14 ECHR (although not expressly set out in the Judgment, presumably in conjunction with A1P1). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:26 am
Because the trial court’s findings of fact support its conclusion that the search was “directly STATE V. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:35 am
On appeal it was held that the lawyer's threat to report a crime to enforcement agencies, coupled with a demand for money, constituted extortion even when the plaintiff in fact committed the crime and owed the money. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:07 pm
DOES BANKRUPTCY LAW CONSIDER A DEBT OWED TO A GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY, FOR LIVING EXPENSES UNRELATED TO A SEPARATION OR DIVORCE, TO BE CHILD SUPPORT? [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:56 am
The Convention itself does not define what constitutes a child being "settled in its new environment. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:37 am
As I’ve noted in earlier posts, the 4th Amendment’s prohibition on “unreasonable” searches and seizures only applies to “state action,” i.e., to searches and/or seizures that are carried out by law enforcement officers or others who are acting on behalf of the federal government or a state government. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 11:45 am
The Michigan Paternity Act only confers standing on three classes of individuals to file a paternity suit: 1) the mother of a child born out of wedlock; 2) the father of a child born out of wedlock; and, 3) the Family Independence Agency on behalf of a child born out of wedlock and supported by public assistance. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
(citation omitted).2 Öcalan v. [read post]
