Search for: "State, in Interest of Brown"
Results 81 - 100
of 7,099
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
The Free Speech Trifecta: How the Court Could Fundamentally Alter Free Speech in Three Pending Cases
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Biden’s sole nominee on the court, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, has long been an enigma on the issue of free speech. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 8:52 am
Cities across the United States have already taken the step to ban government use of this technology, and Montana has specifically recognized a privacy interest in phenotype data. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
” This continues the sordid state of affairs that existed prior to the pandemic, where hundreds of criminal cases were being dismissed annually for delay[9]. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Sherrod Brown in a contest that could determine control of the Senate. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:31 pm
Timothy Brown Jr.: Justice for Family? [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
" State ex rel. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 5:10 am
State Department called “absurd. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 11:35 am
It’s interesting because I then left Bahrain and came to Denmark and I started seeing how, as a Brown, Muslim woman, my right to free expression doesn’t look the same as someone who is White living in Europe. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 9:31 am
appeared first on Brown Rudnick. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 3:27 am
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson made a similar point. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:36 pm
UPDATE: In the original version of this post, I accidentally attributed a statement by Justice Elena Kagan to Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
Sure, the California Supreme Court said X in Hatch, and this case is very much like X, and as a general matter, lower state courts are bound to follow superior state tribunals.But not when there's an intervening decision of an even higher court; in this case, the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
State court analogues to these rules replicated the debate in state courts around the country. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 10:18 am
B.J.F. (1989) ("[W]here a newspaper publishes truthful information which it has lawfully obtained, punishment may lawfully be imposed, if at all, only when narrowly tailored to a state interest of the highest order. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 5:15 am
In the aftermath of the murder of George Floyd, there was renewed interest in the doctrine of qualified immunity. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Today’s rule is the culmination of efforts by various interests to hijack and use the federal securities laws for their climate-related goals. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
And states in particular have less of an interest in presidential elections, simply because they are national offices, and the notion that states could adjudicate qualifications make these determinations and contested factual claims, and then reach kind of a patchwork result across the United States, not something that makes a whole lot of sense structurally.That was Part II-B of the per curiam opinion, joined in full by Justice Barrett, and joined again in logic,… [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
And states in particular have less of an interest in presidential elections, simply because they are national offices, and the notion that states could adjudicate qualifications make these determinations and contested factual claims, and then reach kind of a patchwork result across the United States, not something that makes a whole lot of sense structurally.That was Part II-B of the per curiam opinion, joined in full by Justice Barrett, and joined again in logic,… [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am
Given his decision to refuse a faculty to remove all of the pews, the Chancellor stated that the Petitioners may wish to re-think their proposals in respect of the heating. [read post]
