Search for: "State, in Interest of Jennifer W." Results 81 - 100 of 261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
No dominant subtest, even w/in circuits. [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:44 am
After all, we've got a mother and a grandmother in the White House and one as Secretary of State. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 6:05 am
Griffith (Fordham University), on Monday, July 1, 2019 Tags: Adverse selection, Agency costs, Insurance, Mergers & acquisitions, Moral hazard, Private equity, R&W insurance, Risk management How Boards Govern Disruptive Technology—Key Findings from a Director Survey Posted by Steve Klemash and Jennifer Lee, EY Center for Board Matters, and Kris Pederson, EY, on Monday, July 1, 2019 … [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 7:50 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Mexican legislation deals w/cultural appropriation. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
No one in the TM bar has an interest in cleaning up things like that, but it means nonexperts don’t get much guidance. [read post]
6 May 2007, 2:03 pm
"I think the problem with those laws is that, No. 1, they need to consider a child's best interest. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
In making such a determination, evidentiary material may be considered to "remedy defects in the complaint" (Rovello v Orofino Realty Co., 40 NY2d 633, 636; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 88), "and, unless it can be shown that a material fact as claimed by the pleader to be one is not a fact at all and unless it can be said that no significant dispute exists regarding it," dismissal may not be predicated on such evidentiary material (Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275; 511… [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
In making such a determination, evidentiary material may be considered to "remedy defects in the complaint" (Rovello v Orofino Realty Co., 40 NY2d 633, 636; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 88), "and, unless it can be shown that a material fact as claimed by the pleader to be one is not a fact at all and unless it can be said that no significant dispute exists regarding it," dismissal may not be predicated on such evidentiary material (Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275; 511… [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 10:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Some states do limit the right to commercial speech, but overall it’s applied more broadly. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:59 pm by Bridget Crawford
New for this edition is the inclusion of areas of academic interest, for faculty who self-identified with that information. [read post]