Search for: "State Employees' Association of New Hampshire & a. v. The State of New Hampshire & a."
Results 81 - 100
of 105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2023, 5:53 am
A former Twitter employee interviewed by the Select Committee likened this to the “call-and-response” pattern between the former president and his supporters that had occurred before January 6. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 11:31 am
New Hampshire Regulators Sanction Edward Jones for Cold Calling February 27, 2014– Edward Jones agreed to pay $750,000 to settle allegations by the New Hampshire Bureau of Securities Regulation that it unlawfully solicited residents on the National Do Not Call Registry. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
"[7] Harvesting Social JusticeThese new farmers display a new sensibility: farming with a mission. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
New on the Short Circuit podcast: private rights of action to enforce voting rights and a failed attempt to get Donald Trump kicked off the ballot in New Hampshire on insurrection grounds. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 pm
Most notably, in Hoyt v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 5:28 am
For instance consider the case of Coleman v Attridge Law which finally settled this year and which extended the old Disability Discrimination Act to cover “associative discrimination”, now enshrined in the Equality Act. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 11:40 pm
To be sure, associations generally can’t be required to turn over their membership lists (NAACP v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
After considering evidence about a conversation that husband purportedly had with one of its employees, the Office of Personnel Management affirmed, stating that husband could have elected to receive a reduced lifetime annuity with survivor benefits for a new wife only by notifying OPM of his intentions in a signed writing within two years of his marriage, 5 U.S.C. 8339(k)(2)(A). [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
District Court for the District of New Hampshire granted the SEC’s motion for summary judgment against LBRY, Inc., holding that LBRY offered a crypto asset in violation of the registration provisions of federal securities laws. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 8:00 am
District Court for the District of New Hampshire granted the SEC’s motion for summary judgment against LBRY, Inc., holding that LBRY offered a crypto asset in violation of the registration provisions of federal securities laws. [read post]
12 May 2022, 3:12 pm
The number of ill persons identified in each state is as follows: Arizona (2), California (3), Colorado (6), Connecticut (1), Delaware (1), Georgia (1), Iowa (2), Illinois (5), Kentucky (2), Massachusetts (4), Maryland (2), Maine (3), Minnesota (6), Missouri (1), Montana (1), North Carolina (2), New Hampshire (2), New Jersey (1), Nevada (2), New York (1), Ohio (3), Oklahoma (1), Oregon (1), Pennsylvania (2), South Carolina (1), Texas (3), Utah (4),… [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 9:01 am
Georgia v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am
" See also Brown v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:55 am
Arkansas, Washington, Nebraska, and New York round out the top five states. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:49 am
In New Mexico, Ginsburg delivered the keynote address at the State Bar of New Mexico’s Annual Meeting on August 19. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 4:27 pm
”[11] In a statement, Mark Cave, Associate Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement stated that the settlement, if approved, will “demonstrate that public companies can and should be held accountable for material misrepresentations in their ESG-related disclosures, just as they would for any other material misrepresentations. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
