Search for: "State Ex Rel. Daniels v. Daniels" Results 81 - 100 of 148
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2015, 1:19 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Meanwhile, issues of joint employment will return to the Supreme Court’s docket in State ex rel. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
Referring to counter-terrorism cases and relevant public protocols in the UK, his presentation demonstrated the complexity of state secrets, the supervision of security intelligence agencies, and the tension between human rights and national security. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
Wyeth, Inc., Alabama Supreme Court (x2) – whether an innovator drug manufacturer can be liable for allegedly inadequate/fraudulent warnings where the plaintiff took only a generic drug (Conte issue)·                     State ex rel. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 8:30 pm by A. Brian Albritton
Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit addressed whether the penalties assessed against a defendant under the False Claims Act ("FCA") can ever violate the 8th Amendment's protection against "excessive fines" in the appeal, United States ex rel Kurt Bunk & Daniel Heuser v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:06 am by Amy Howe
The Court also heard oral arguments yesterday in Mississippi ex rel. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 1:29 pm by Lisa Baird
Supreme Court invited the Office of Solicitor General to provide its views regarding the level of specificity required when alleging activities in violation of the civil False Claims Act (FCA) (United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Bursch & Cassie Cox (student), Qualified Immunity and the Application of Pearson: C.F. ex rel. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 11:07 am by WSLL
STATE OF WYOMING, ex rel., WORKERS’ SAFETY AND COMPENSATION DIVISION Docket Number: S-12-0250 URL: http://www.courts.state.wy.us/Opinions.aspxAppeal from the District Court of Albany County, Honorable Dan R. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Compare Daniel Gervais et al. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/QeYSVx (Michael Schmidt) Proper Wildcard Searching: Why You Should Give a Dam* – http://bit.ly/Pjc34V (Doug Austin) Radically Reinvent The Review Process - http://bit.ly/Q2x6LK (George Kiersted) Rambus ‘Shred Days’ Ruled Spoliation, $397M Judgment Reduced - http://bit.ly/Pn446U (Jan Wolfe) Reasonable Particularity And Social Network eDiscovery - http://bit.ly/P0Kqxr (IT-Lex) State Judge Imposes $300K… [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm by Charon QC
The answer seems to be relatively straightforward. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:57 pm by A. Brian Albritton
The Blog of Legal Times recently featured an interesting case where a District Court Judge refused after the trial of a False Claims Act ("FCA") case to impose the minimum $50.2 million Civil False Claims Act penalty on the grounds that the penalty was unconstitutionally excessive in violation of the 8th Amendment:  United States ex rel Kurt Bunk & Daniel Heuser v. [read post]