Search for: "State Farm v. INSURANCE DEPT." Results 81 - 100 of 164
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2010, 7:33 am
  We reject the further contention of Giacometti and State Farm Insurance Company, a defendant in appeal No. 1 (State Farm), that any use of a vehicle is with permission of the owner pursuant to the presumption in Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388 (1). [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 8:10 am
UM – STOLEN VEHICLE – EVIDENCE NEEDED TO OVERCOME PRESUMPTION OF PERMISSIVE USE – FRAMED-ISSUE HEARING State Farm Mut. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 12:16 pm
[Guarino], 11 AD3d 909, 911; Medina v State Farm Mut. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 8:19 am
  * * * * * "An arbitration award in a mandatory arbitration proceeding will be upheld if it is supported by the evidence and is not arbitrary and capricious" (Matter of State Farm Mut. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 9:11 pm
People v Myles, 58 AD3d 889, 890-892 [3d Dept 2009] [a consumer of electricity could be guilty of falsifying business records for bypassing the electric meter, causing it to falsely record the amount of electricity used]; People v Johnson, 39 AD3d 338, 339 [1st Dept 2007] [a co-defendant of public assistance applicant could be guilty of falsifying business records of the agency]; People v Smith, 300 AD2d 1145, 1146 [4th Dept 2002]… [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 1:21 pm
  Falco ultimately made a claim to and received a payment of $8,180 for the damage from his own collision insurance company, State Farm. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 9:40 pm
FARMOWNERS – "INSURED PREMISES" – USE OF FARM VEHICLE ON PUBLIC ROADWAY – MOTOR VEHICLE SUBJECT TO REGISTRATION McLaughlin v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 10:36 am
Respondent made a claim for uninsured motorists (UM) coverage benefits to State Farm, her mother's personal auto insurer. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 9:10 am
Co. v Kopsky, 137 AD2d 804; Anzalone v State Farm Mut. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:24 pm
Co. of N.Y., 8 AD3d 310 [plaintiff stated General Business Law § 349 cause of action by alleging that the defendant engaged in deceptive practices by increasing the cost of insurance rates without regard to certain flexible factors which would have required the raise to decrease]; Skibinsky v State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 11:53 am
Gray (2nd Dept., decided 12/15/2009) State Farm insured the respondent's vehicle under a North Carolina personal auto policy with $100,000 per person/$300,000 per accident bodily injury liability limits. [read post]