Search for: "State Of Washington, Respondent V D. A. B, Appellant" Results 81 - 100 of 129
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
A controlled substance named or described in s. 893.03(1)(a), (1)(b), (1)(d), (2)(a), (2)(b), or (2)(c) 4., commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084 [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm by Matthew Bush
Conditional cross-petition for certiorari Brief for Cross-Respondents Morgan v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am by Matthew Bush
§ 2254(d)(2)’s invitation to decide the reasonableness of a state-court factual determination fits with 28 U.S.C. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:45 am by Matthew Bush
§ 2254(d)(2)’s invitation to decide the reasonableness of a state-court factual determination fits with 28 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am by Kiera Flynn
Chamber of Commerce in support of respondentAmicus brief of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America in support of respondent (forthcoming)Brief for respondent RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm by Christa Culver
§ 2254(d)(1) to a state appellate court which held that the evidence was sufficient.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (2d Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition (forthcoming) Title: Allison v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm by Mandelman
In California, for example, in the appellate court’s decision in Gomes v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:12 pm by Christa Culver
§ 547(b); (2) whether criminal restitution, which is ordered to further the state's goals of deterrence and rehabilitation, is “to or for the benefit of a creditor” under 11 U.S.C. [read post]