Search for: "State Of Washington, Respondent V. S. B., Appellant" Results 81 - 100 of 198
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Shaw 13-897Issue: Whether, in a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a state appellate court’s holding that an omitted state law issue ult [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:43 am by Aaron
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court: State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 3:36 pm
The others on the panel are appellate and trial judges in Washington. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 7:12 am by John Elwood
Alabama, which applies to mandatory sentences, requires invalidation of respondent Laycelle White’s sentence. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
IMS Health Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2653, 2659 (2011), and United States v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am by Matthew Bush
Washington, that prejudice requires a showing that, but for counsel’s error, there is a reasonable probability of a different outcome.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (6th Cir.)Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionReply of petitioner Parker v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
Washington, 19-333, involving a First Amendment challenge to a states efforts to impose penalties on a floral designer who refused for religious reasons to provide flowers for same-sex weddings. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 6:29 am by David G. Badertscher
Queens Spy Shop CLINTON COUNTYFamily Law Court May Select Different Alternative Than Placing Child With Non-Respondent Father Matter of Keith "B. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 12:54 pm by Emma DiNapoli, Jacques Singer-Emery
Keith Parrella’s ruling in Appellate Exhibit (AE) 118M relating to the discovery process. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm by Jacques Singer-Emery
In a session cut short by a stay from the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR), the military commission in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 7:48 am by Florian Mueller
Oracle America (petitioner v. respondent as opposed to plaintiff v. defendant): the Android maker's non-copyrightability defense has a snow flake's chance in hell.I wrote yesterday's triumphant post on the basis of having listened to the hearing on C-SPAN Radio (over the web). [read post]