Search for: "State Personnel Board v. Superior Court"
Results 81 - 100
of 139
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
A high degree of medical skill would be needed to ensure avoidance of this outcome.The involvement of health personnel in executions. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 7:51 am
Reversing the district court’s dismissal of her claims on summary judgment, the appeals court ruled that she presented sufficient evidence of pretext and that her disclosures were protected under the WPA as originally enacted in 1989 (Kerr v Jewell, December 9, 2013, per curiam). [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:23 am
The Lower Court's Entry of Summary Judgment in Carnival's Favor At the lower State Court level, Carnival relied upon the long line of decisions exemplified by Barbetta v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Superior Court of California, Orange County 13-956Issue: Whether the California Court of Appeal erred when it deepened an acknowledged circuit split and held—contrary to this Court's decisions in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am
Forty-five years ago, the baseball world trained its attention on the Wisconsin Supreme Court and its impending decision in the case of Wisconsin v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:30 pm
Superior Court has jurisdiction under the Stored Communications Act (SCA) because it is a “court of criminal jurisdiction of a State authorized by law of that State to issue search warrants. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 6:25 am
Moreover, the state high court agreed with the trial court that qualified immunity barred the employee’s Sec. 1983 claim against the individual defendants. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:52 am
The good news is that the California Legislature is being proactive on this front, too, petitioning the California Supreme Court in Legislature of the State of California v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:48 am
Access to personnel files, meals and breaks, smoking, time off for jury duty or for other reasons, the timing of final paychecks and many more issues are governed by law and not by employers’ preferences or past practices. [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:48 am
Access to personnel files, meals and breaks, smoking, time off for jury duty or for other reasons, the timing of final paychecks and many more issues are governed by law and not by employers’ preferences or past practices. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
After considering evidence about a conversation that husband purportedly had with one of its employees, the Office of Personnel Management affirmed, stating that husband could have elected to receive a reduced lifetime annuity with survivor benefits for a new wife only by notifying OPM of his intentions in a signed writing within two years of his marriage, 5 U.S.C. 8339(k)(2)(A). [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
23 May 2014, 9:22 am
In Rumsfeld v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 2:01 pm
Superior Court (Johnson) (2015) 61 Cal.4th 696 [California Supreme Court held that even prosecutors must comply with the Pitchess procedures if they seek information from confidential peace officer personnel records]). [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 5:33 am
Most people have not had the experience of attending a court proceeding or testifying under oath. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/SAN State of MI v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm
Discuss the accident only with the ambulance and medical personnel, your attorney and with representatives of your insurance company. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 6:47 am
In the case of McCrary v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
From the States and Municipalities Alabama – Supreme Court Stops Lower Court Order Requiring Alabama to Draw a New District Voting Map Favorable to Black Residents MSN – Robert Barnes (Washington Post) | Published: 2/7/2022 The U.S. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:05 pm
Description: The Miami Immigration Court is part of the United States Department of Justice’s Executive Office for Immigration Review. [read post]
