Search for: "State ex rel. Doe v. Register" Results 81 - 100 of 169
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2012, 3:40 am by Russ Bensing
  Somewhat interesting was State ex rel. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  The most striking example of apparently mistaken incontestability comes from B&B v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 2:14 am
It does not represent the official position of the European Commission. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 2:49 pm
The application was rejected pursuant to Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of the CTM Regulation and the examiner stated that Maharishi had failed to prove that the sign had acquired distinctive character through use in Belgium and France, ex Article 7(3). [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
For individuals, the compliance costs could be disproportionately large relative to their financial activity. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 9:23 pm
For example, forum states may have a lower bar for registration requirements than foreign states; thus, out of state conduct that may be deemed relatively benign in the foreign state may prompt severe consequences once the migrant offender moves to the forum state. [read post]