Search for: "State ex rel. Justice v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2010, 7:36 am
U.S. ex rel. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 4:05 am
It is also apparent that certain Alabama state courts do not view this Court’s ruling in Searcy as binding precedent....The Court notes that the Supreme Court of Alabama denied the pending mandamus petitions and entered judgment in Ex parte State of Alabama ex rel. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:25 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 2:43 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 7:20 am
When the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Eisenstein on April 21, only Justice Ginsburg seemed inclined to adopt a strict reading of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1) and provide a sixty-day window to appeal only when the United States actually intervenes in a qui tam action under the False Claims Act. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 1:16 pm
On March 17, 2020, the Ohio Democratic Party filed a lawsuit, State ex rel. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 3:13 pm
By the C|C Whistleblower Lawyer Team Constantine Cannon is proud to have partnered with AARP Foundation to represent AARP, AARP Foundation, Center for Medicare Advocacy, Justice in Aging, the National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term Care, and the National Health Law Program, as amici curiae in the whistleblower-initiated case of United States ex rel. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 1:30 pm
ex rel. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 12:58 pm
On April 18, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the consolidated cases of U.S. ex rel. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 10:55 pm
In an apparent first use of the Department of Justice’s new authority to veto motions to dismiss qui tam cases under the False Claims Act’s public disclosure bar, the government filed its notice of opposition in U.S. ex rel. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 3:10 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:31 pm
The Minnesota case United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 9:01 am
Key Precedent Louisiana ex Rel. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:13 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
""United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:39 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 4:26 pm
Like, in several places in the opinion, that she's saying that the ordinary things that you look at when you decide whether fees are reasonable -- i.e., the level of success -- don't matter in the context of state-initiated charitable trust actions. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 7:34 am
On Monday, the first day of the new Supreme Court term, the Court heard argument in Kahler v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:22 am
State v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 7:20 pm
In U.S. ex rel. [read post]
