Search for: "State in Interest of JJ" Results 81 - 100 of 319
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2013, 5:06 pm by Rumpole
Send us an email if you're interested. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 1:27 am by Mark Summerfield
  Nonetheless, this case will generate some interest, if only because the result in Australia is opposed to the outcome of equivalent litigation between Sequenom and Ariosa involving a corresponding patent in the United States. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:07 pm by James McComish
Joyce v Sunland Waterfront (BVI) Ltd [2011] FCAFC 95 (19 August 2011)   Related posts:Australian Lawyers and Overseas Clients An interesting and unusual case before the State Administrative Tribunal... [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
ZAYAS, JJ. 2018-03024 (Index No. 3841/17) In the Matter of Lawrence Union Free School District, petitioner/cross respondent, vNew York State Public Employment Relations Board, respondent/cross petitioner, et al., respondent. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
ZAYAS, JJ. 2018-03024 (Index No. 3841/17) In the Matter of Lawrence Union Free School District, petitioner/cross respondent, vNew York State Public Employment Relations Board, respondent/cross petitioner, et al., respondent. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 12:54 pm by Patrick A. Malone
But Oklahoma officials have struck hard at pharmaceutical interests by winning a $572-million nuisance ruling from a state judge against Johnson and Johnson, a legendary and once-respected health care brand. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
ZAYAS, JJ. 2018-03024 (Index No. 3841/17) In the Matter of Lawrence Union Free School District, petitioner/cross respondent, v New York State Public Employment Relations Board, respondent/cross petitioner, et al., respondent. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
ZAYAS, JJ. 2018-03024 (Index No. 3841/17) In the Matter of Lawrence Union Free School District, petitioner/cross respondent, v New York State Public Employment Relations Board, respondent/cross petitioner, et al., respondent. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:10 am by Stephen Bilkis
Miller, J.P., Ritter, Covello and McCarthy, JJ., concur. [read post]
21 May 2013, 4:45 am by Ed Silverman
Once again, a plethora of interesting events has occurred since the last time we stopped by. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Hunt, this Court determined that a state agency with no traditional members could still qualify as a genuine membership organization in substance because the agency repre- sented the interests of individuals and otherwise satisfied Hunt’s three-part test for organizational standing. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Hunt, this Court determined that a state agency with no traditional members could still qualify as a genuine membership organization in substance because the agency repre- sented the interests of individuals and otherwise satisfied Hunt’s three-part test for organizational standing. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:07 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, in which a unanimous Court concluced that "potentially valuable economic information" of the sort "necessary to make discretionary economic decisions" is not the sort of traditional property interest that can support a conviction for wire fraud under federal law. [read post]