Search for: "State of Alabama v. B. T. D.; B. T. D. v. State of Alabama" Results 81 - 100 of 244
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2018, 12:22 pm by John Elwood
§ 3731(b)(2) in a suit in which the United States has declined to intervene and, if so, whether the relator constitutes an “official of the United States” for purposes of Section 3731(b)(2). [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am by John Elwood
Alabama to give her the time to prepare an opinion respecting denial in the case. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the October 26 conference)   AT&T, Inc v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 2:00 pm by John Buhl
Supreme Court Is Likely to Uphold State Powers in Some Way The pending South Dakota v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am by Gustavo Arballo
Bolton fue resuelto el mismo día y las opiniones deben leerse juntas (y, de hecho, se "citan" entre si). [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 11:39 am by John Elwood
§ 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:00 am by Colby Pastre
A further seven states unhelpfully said their answers cannot be relied upon as guidance by taxpayers (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Massachusetts, and New Mexico). [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 8:30 am by Joseph Tartakovsky
Some may wonder if the threatened flooding and burden on states isn’t already underway from the creation of the initial exception for ineffective trial-court assistance (in a case called Martinez v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
” United States v. [read post]