Search for: "State of California, ex rel" Results 81 - 100 of 841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2013, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
Unfortunately (or perhaps fortunately, depending on your perspective) the holding in American Trucking is very narrow and does not shed much light on the issue before the California Supreme Court in People ex rel. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
The Pfizer Decision The court in Pfizer began its analysis by noting that interpretations of federal antitrust law were not dispositive of the issue of recovery under California’s antitrust statutes as embodied in the Cartwright Act because  “judicial interpretation of the Sherman Act, while often helpful, is not directly probative of the Cartwright drafters’ intent,” State of California ex. rel. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 8:23 am by Doug B.
And while they wait on San Quentin State Prison's death row, they lead a relatively comfortable existence, with single cells and access to the best attorneys fighting for prisoners' rights. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Ethics National: “Meadows Contempt Vote Poses Thorny Questions for DOJ” by Rebecca Beitsch and Harper Neidig (The Hill) for MSN California: “Ex-S.F. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:31 am
Leslie Salt Co. (1969) 70 Cal.2d 627, 636 (Cooper); see People ex rel. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 7:46 am by Megan Geuss
On Monday, Noe Iniguez, 36, was sentenced to a year of jail time for three criminal counts, including one count of violating California's relatively new revenge porn law. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 5:14 pm
    First, the holding of the case, People ex rel. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:00 am by Jeramie J. Fortenberry, LL.M.
The California Probate Code’s undue influence rule mirrors the “confidential relationship” presumption of most common law states (see the Section entitled What is Undue Influence?). [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
’” (I have written in academic scholarship that the Hawke Court reached the right result because Ohio’s ratification was already communicated to DC and could not be undone, but not because the word “legislature” should be read to forbid the use of the referendum device.)In two other important cases from the first half of the twentieth century, Ohio ex. rel. [read post]