Search for: "State of California v. Watt"
Results 81 - 95
of 95
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2008, 10:20 am
Youngblood and California v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against Unitronics or its… [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Watts, No. 07-2462 In an action brought under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 alleging that the defendants' failure to supervise resulted in arrests without probable cause, illegal warrantless searches, and use of excessive force, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where plaintiffs failed to establish that the actions of defendants amounted to supervisory encouragement, condonation or acquiescence, or gross negligence amounting to deliberate indifference. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 8:59 pm
Supreme Court of California, July 14, 2008 Silicon Valley Taxpayers Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
Box 7788 Santa Rosa, CA 95407-0788 Phone: (707) 566-8647 Fax: (707) 586-3279 E-mail: ucpnb@sonic.net UCP of the Golden Gate 1970 Broadway, Suite 600 Oakland, CA 94612 Phone: (510) 832-7430 Fax: (510) 839-1329 E-mail: info@ucpgg.org Web: http://www.ucpgg.org UCP of Stanislaus County 1213 13th Street Modesto, CA 95354 Phone: (209) 577-2122 Fax: (209) 577-2392 E-mail: rlonczak@yahoo.com CALIFORNIA STATE RESOURCES AGING The California Association of Area Agencies on… [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:04 am
The case, known as Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 7:30 pm
On July 2, 1976, in deciding the case of Gregg v Georgia, the Supreme Court legalised capital punishment after a decade-long moratorium on executions. [read post]
21 May 2007, 5:31 pm
" Watts Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 5:31 pm
" Watts Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 1:46 pm
State v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 6:53 am
Watts v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 8:23 am
The California state courts acted unreasonably. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 pm
Cunningham provides a big boost in two areas of current and future Ninth Circuit rehearings en banc.In Cunningham, the Court addressed the California state sentencing system, which permits a sentence at the high end of a guideline based upon certain findings. [read post]
6 Jan 2007, 6:49 pm
State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2006, 1:56 pm
Brown could be facing charges in a number of countries; it remains to be seen, however, what future actions will be taken.[1] Susan Watts, Stem Cell Treatment Warning, BBC, Aug. 30, 2006.[2] Id.[3] Id.[4] Id.[5] See United States v. [read post]
