Search for: "State of Delaware v. Akins."
Results 81 - 96
of 96
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2010, 5:13 pm
Genger No. 3994-VCS, Delaware Court of Chancery (Dec. 9, 2009) [PDF]. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
United States Docket: 09-342 Issues: (1) What constitutes the proper denominator in the takings fraction under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 6:32 am
Times) has a piece on the State of Delaware's appeal to the Court of restrictions on its sports-betting lottery. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
Only a couple of other states host substantial numbers of out-of-state LLCs, and they don't come close to Delaware. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 3:42 pm
Airborne Health, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
As New York's highest court stated in Wildenstein & Co. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
Delaware Director of Revenue Issue: Whether the Delaware Wholesale Merchants’ License Tax, 30 Del. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 10:05 pm
ACS State Healthcare, LLC v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 1:12 pm
And under the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in Lewis v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
McPadden v. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 2:50 pm
" (citing in footnote 57 to Teachers' Retirement System of Louisiana v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:41 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 10:00 am
The most recent,Desimone v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 8:45 am
The following commentary is by Nicole Elam, a student at Howard Law School and a summer associate in Akin Gump's DC office. [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 4:40 pm
Blaine dismissed for lack of jurisdiction holding an order committing a state capital habeas petitioner for psychiatric evaluation is not a final order on the merits of his habeas petition, and the commitment order did not fall within a narrow class of "collateral" orders that may be reviewed.Up the Delaware River from the Third Circuit (which sits in Philadelphia) the New Jersey Supreme Court (sits in Trenton) finally weighs in on mental retardation standards in… [read post]
