Search for: "State of Minnesota v. District Court"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,674
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2014, 8:50 am
Bouncing Angels, Inc., a district court in Minnesota found personal jurisdiction over a defendant company that sold a single (allegedly infringing) inflatable carousel bounce house within the state. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 11:35 am
In the case of State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 11:35 am
In the case of State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 8:39 am
” These prohibitions were recently challenged by the State of North Dakota and other complainants in the United States District Court, District of Minnesota. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:24 pm
On May 31, 2016, the Supreme Court decided United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 9:41 am
" State v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 11:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 8:01 pm
We therefore conclude that the district court erred in permitting the officer to testify about appellant’s pre-counseled, pre-arrest, and pre-Miranda silence in the state’s case-in-chief. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:23 am
On March 30, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral argument inUnited States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 10:22 am
Whitaker v. 3M Co., Ramsey County District Court, Second Judicial District, Case No. 62-C4-04-012239 (April 11, 2009) [Slip Opn., at 2-3]. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:11 am
Last month the Minnesota Supreme Court accepted review of State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2020, 9:27 pm
Minnesota: In Carson v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 6:12 am
Responding in the affirmative to a certified question from the federal district court (one that drew amicus briefs from both sides), the state high court concluded that the legislature abrogated the court’s interpretation of “good faith” when it amended the statute in 2013, and eliminated the “judicially created requirement” that a whistleblower must act with the intention of “exposing an illegality” in order to… [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 7:55 am
Here, a federal district court in Minnesota agreed with the employer that the Minnesota legislature did not intend for DATWA to apply to out-of-state employers hiring for out of state jobs, so the statute did not have effect outside Minnesota’s borders (Olson v Push, Inc, August 19, 2014, Montgomery, A). [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:06 am
District Court for the District of Minnesota recently dismissed a directors and officers liability coverage suit, rejecting plaintiffs' argument that an underlying suit had to be brought by the insured in his capacity as an insured in order to implicate the policy's insured vs. insured exclusion. [read post]
15 May 2018, 3:43 pm
In the case of State of Vermont v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 12:20 am
Tarek ibn Ziyad Academy, (D MN, July 21, 2009), a Minnesota federal district court held that plaintiff has taxpayer standing to challenge as an Establishment Clause violation the funding of a charter school by the state of Minnesota. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:27 pm
A Federal District Court in Minnesota granted privileges to employees in two religious discrimination suits brought by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) that sought the right to pray during the day against a leading Minnesota chicken processor, Gold'n Plump Poultry, Inc., and an employment agency, The Work Connection. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 8:54 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 4:29 pm
The 8th Circuit today reversed two district court decisions and held that medical residents who work more than 40 hours per week at the Mayo Clinic and University of Minnesota are subject to employment taxes. [read post]
