Search for: "State of New York v Myers" Results 81 - 100 of 312
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2015, 8:28 pm by Sean Hanover
Although only a couple of states expressly allow for pretrial taint hearings, several others address the issue of taint in separate pretrial hearings; these states include New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and Wyoming. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:29 pm by Brooke
Klemp is reviewed at Marginalia.The Improbable Wendell Willkie: The Businessman Who Saved the Republican Party and His Country, and Conceived a New World Order by David Levering Lewis is reviewed in The New Yorker and The New York Times.In The New York Times is a review of These Truths: A History of the United States by Jill Lepore. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 6:19 am
Supreme Court indicated in Connick v Myers, 461 US 138, constitutional free speech rights are not implicated when only matters of a personal interest to the individual, in contrast to matters of public concern, are involved.. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm by Laura Dooley and Rodger Citron
For example, when a New York resident drives to Vermont to see the fall foliage and gets into an accident there, the New York resident may be sued in Vermont by the other driver claiming that the New York driver’s negligence caused the accident and any ensuing injuries.When a defendant is subject to general jurisdiction, it may be sued in the state’s courts on any claim no matter where the underlying events occurred. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 10:27 am by David Markus
Georgia was next at 194 complaints per 100,000 residents, followed by California and Michigan at about 122 complaints each and New York at 110. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 10:15 am by Scott Sternberg
  For example, a New York plaintiff files suit against two New Jersey defendants, a Delaware defendant, a Pennsylvania defendant, and a Louisiana defendant in New Jersey state court. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 3:09 am
"In Council 82, v State of New York, 255 A.D.2d 54, aff'd. 94 NY2d at 329, New York courts held that a Department's rule does not trump an employee's First Amendment rights. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:46 am by Sheppard Mullin
The plaintiff commenced an action in the Eastern District of New York alleging that he and other ABMs were misclassified as exempt and denied overtime in violation of the New York Labor Law. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 8:26 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
O’Melveny & Myers (link also courtesy of the AmLaw Daily) – U.S. [read post]