Search for: "State of South Carolina, ex rel" Results 81 - 100 of 130
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2014, 10:51 am by Jeff Welty
South Carolina, 476 U.S. 1 (1986) (explaining that “a defendant’s disposition to make a well-behaved and peaceful adjustment to life in prison is itself an aspect of his character that is by its nature relevant to the sentencing determination”); State v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
South Carolina – Ethics Regulators Question Lobbyist’s Campaign Contribution to S.C. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:09 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the complaint in State of North Carolina ex rel. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 11:55 am by JB
It had never been applied to 14th Amendment section 5 or 15th Amendment section 2 legislation in the past; and South Carolina v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:00 am by Robert Chesney
Consider the famous case Ex parte Milligan, which involved events during the American Civil War. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 2:46 pm by Jack Pringle
§ 1332(d)(11)(B)(i).THE COURT’S ANALYSISDefendants argued that a “claim-by-claim approach” (followed by the 5th Circuit in Louisiana ex rel. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 5:54 am by Trey Mills
The court referred to the four factors that help determine the work relationship set forth in  Wilkinson ex rel. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:40 am by Randy Barnett
 In this speech, he challenged all Americans, North and South, to live up to the promise of both documents: [T]he purpose of this celebration, is the Fourth of July. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 1:34 pm by Jeff Gamso
  You know, until they got it right.There is no majority opinion in Louisiana ex rel. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:09 pm
 I note only that the use of Santorum's position against him in the South Carolina campaign is indeed a sign that it was one of the most laudable aspects of Santorum's Senate career. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:44 am by Gregory Forman
 With South Carolina being a state of below average median income, jurisprudence should encourage clear rules in order to reduce legal fees. [read post]