Search for: "State of Washington v. J D C" Results 81 - 100 of 513
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2022, 6:04 pm
  Brief Reflections on Emerging Global Trade Empires: From Trans-Pacific Partnership to “Building Back Better” (B3W) in the Shadow of China's Belt & Road Initiative Larry Catá Backer  pp. 159-178 (Access Here) D. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 8:57 pm by Bill Marler
The FDA and state and local regulatory officials traced the romaine lettuce to 23 farms and 36 fields in the Yuma growing region. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 1:03 am by Bill Marler
Disease Burden from Viral Hepatitis A, B, and C in the United States. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
Drawing in witnesses When the Court recognized a public right of access to criminal trials, in Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
The Trump administration implemented MPP by utilizing the “contiguous territory return” provision in Section 235(b)(2)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) in a way that it had never been used before. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 1:18 pm by ernst
Parrish pitted a Washington State hotel against a chambermaid, Elsie Parrish, who claimed that she was owed the state’s minimum wage. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
But if a state wants to ban viewpoint discrimination by platforms, § 230(c)(2) does not preempt that choice. [read post]