Search for: "State v. A. T. D."
Results 81 - 100
of 23,793
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2024, 4:01 am
Criminal Law: Language RightsR. v. [read post]
18 May 2024, 7:41 am
Mular v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:07 pm
" But even if you hadn't forfeited it, you'd still lose. [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:49 pm
I'd like to think that legal education doesn't boil down to "look it up in Webster's". [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:07 pm
Why wasn't it throwing Griswold v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:57 am
Earlier this year, the Fourth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:10 am
United States v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:29 am
But the association with data protection doesn't end there! [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 2:02 pm
So Judge Gregory Williams (D. [read post]
14 May 2024, 1:14 pm
Seems like you could just write it out.But as long as everyone know what you mean, it probably doesn't really matter much. [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:37 pm
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 8:43 am
That Norton didn’t have retrospective effect. [read post]
11 May 2024, 10:09 am
This money judgment, however, only states that a party must pay a particular sum. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:10 am
Schwartz v Oshman & Mirisola, LLP 2024 NY Slip Op 31592(U) May 3, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 155780/2023 Judge: Dakota D. [read post]