Search for: "State v. Advertiser Co." Results 81 - 100 of 2,623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The court also held that the Chinese company was not entitled to the benefit of the ACPA’s safe harbor provision because it could not have reasonably believed that its registration of PRU.COM was lawful (The Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”And in any event, the suggestion that the First Amendment problem dissolves because regulated individuals remain free to speak themselves is in deep tension with the reasoning of other precedents of the Court.For example, in 1974 in Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 12:53 pm by admin
In late 2010, the Tribunal imposed AMPs of $20,000 and $10,000 against parties in Canada (Commissioner of Competition) v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 6:15 am by Steven Boutwell
This ruling is hardly a surprise and is consistent with the Court’s recent decisions in BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Pacific, the American Bar Association, Section of Antitrust Law, Private Advertising Litigation and Civil Practice & Procedure Committees, will present a one-hour teleseminar entitled "Class Certification in Consumer Fraud Class Actions After Wal-Mart v. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
The ASA has been designated as the co-regulator for VSP-controlled advertising, with Ofcom acting as the statutory backstop regulator. [read post]
3 May 2010, 10:16 am
 Tiffany & Co. v. eBay Inc., No. 08- 3947 (2d Cir. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 4:02 pm
", Tiffany Rings" and "Tiffany &Co. under $50. [read post]