Search for: "State v. Berliner" Results 81 - 100 of 607
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2021, 2:13 pm by Ralf Michaels
Similar to previous cases, such as Mennesson v France, Labassee v France, andParadiso and Campanelli v Italy, this complaint originated from the refusal of national authorities to recognise the parent-child relationship established in accordance with foreign law on the ground that surrogacy is prohibited under national law. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 5:42 pm
  Not everyone shares the same world view, expectaitons, and experiences of those brought up among the best that Berlin, Paris, or New York ccan offer those with means enough to enjoy them. [read post]
30 May 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
United States The Guardian had a piece “Chicago mayor sued by journalist for limiting interviews to reporters of color”. [read post]
9 May 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
United States A federal judge in Maryland this week followed through on a previous warning to sanction a lawyer best known for representing Rep. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 7:04 am by Jan von Hein
Acknowledgment of paternity before birth In its judgment of 5/5/2020, the Kammergericht Berlin (Higher Regional Court of Berlin) addressed one of the main outstanding issues of German private international law of filiation. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 1:04 pm by Elin Hofverberg
Väinö Tanner 5 years, 6 months imprisonment. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 8:03 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch The Supreme Court has issued a unanimous decision in the stolen-art case of Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 7:23 am by Eric Goldman
State) * Pre-COVID, I cracked the mystery of the chipmunk emoji * A few quick links that I haven’t previously posted: – Lindemer v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 11:53 am
It takes place 13-15 January organized by the Graduate Institute Geneva, and Humboldt University Berlin,  as part of the research group OSAIC (Overlapping Spheres of Authority and Interface Conflicts in the Global Order) with special thanks to the organizational genius of Hannah Birkenkötter and Nico Krisch. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:02 am by Nedim Malovic
In this sense, the CJEU reasoned that paragraph 1 in that provision must be interpreted as allowing a court of a Member State to apply a convention concluded between a Member State of the EU and a non-member State before 1 January 1958 or, for States acceding to the EU, before the date of their accession, such as the Convention between Switzerland and Germany concerning the Reciprocal Protection of Patents, Designs and Trademarks, signed in Berlin on 13… [read post]