Search for: "State v. Bitting" Results 81 - 100 of 9,813
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2024, 9:28 am by Andrew Weissmann
That may be an interesting bit of trivia, but legally beside the point. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am by Adam Ziegler
We’d all been working for over a year on a contract that would make it possible, someday in the future, for everyone to have free and open access to all the official court decisions ever published in the United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 2:48 am by steve cornforth blog
The important bit of course concerns the actual time scales! [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Since the Continental Casualty v Argentina arbitral tribunal directly referred to the jurisprudence of the Appellate Body under GATT Article XX when interpreting a necessity test under a non-precluded measures clause of a BIT, there has been significant scholarly debate as to whether the concept of necessity as interpreted in WTO law is an appropriate model for international investment law. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
This iterative process continued in countries like India and China, each factory adding its own interpretation and modifications along the way.[17] Wiesner stated, “One thing we’re always so amazed by is the creativity that comes out of the half of the process when producing an object [in a factory]. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 5:50 am by Harold Hongju Koh
He saw a United States in turmoil after the January 6th Capitol attack, under former President Donald Trump. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am by Josh Richman
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
Of course, this kind of oversight can be very inconvenient to those who would like a bit of secrecy. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:42 pm
The set up of the Ethics Council makes it virtually impossible both to effectively engage in its mission and to avoid  a little bit of profiling, or of strategic (and thus value enhancing) targeting. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
” Since the officers failed to give proper notice of their “purpose” prior to entering the apartment, the AD1 thought the entry was unlawful, and that the New York County Supreme Court should have granted SJ’s motion to suppress the evidence retrieved and that the conviction thus needed to be reversed.That had to be suppressing.# # #DECISIONPeople v Jones [read post]