Search for: "State v. Brighter"
Results 81 - 100
of 125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2021, 10:30 am
The PSED is “designed to secure the brighter illumination of a person’s disability so that, to the extent that it bears upon his rights under other laws it attracts a full appraisal”. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 12:22 pm
Benham, Brighter Sunshine: Proposed Changes to Rule 76A, 100 The Advoc. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 3:29 pm
House Bill 1435/ Senate Bill 783 (both passed) known as the Brighter Tomorrow Act seeks to bolster solar in the State that has failed to keep pace with the Renewable Portfolio Standard nation leading mandate of 14.5% solar power by 2030 (i.e., 55% of that target by 2022), by among other matters causing the PSC to establish a Small Solar Energy Generating System Incentive Program (a key feature of which will include an artificially inflated value for SRECs). [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
If a state were to pass a law today saying that, say, its governor will decide which slate of electors will represent the state in the Electoral College every four years, that law would not violate the United States Constitution.Now, however, such laws have no prospect of being passed in enough states to guarantee a Republican win in 2024. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:19 am
Cooley and Nobles v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:31 am
Supreme Court in Bostock v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 4:29 am
However, his lawyers have explicitly stated that he is selective in licensing his work. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 9:31 am
Case Study: Cazar v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 7:54 pm
On a brighter side, this same balance allows talented athletes to rise and technology to advance. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 10:05 am
In New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 5:35 pm
Can a person with a vision disability insist on brighter lights? [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 1:29 pm
Why there is Kent V. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 6:30 pm
Jackson's famous formula (in the 1952 case of Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 6:34 am
CAAF held in 2023 in United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:39 am
And the Supreme Court shouldn't stick its nose into states' rules that would put a man to death without review because a law office, even one with as much mahogany and marble as Sullivan & Cromwell, screwed up.Justice Scalia made the point more clearly in Holland v. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 6:15 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: UK government revives downloader cut-off proposal; ISPs object (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) (1709 Copyright Blog) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) CAFC grants Microsoft expedited patent appeal in Word case; Microsoft submits opening brief in appeal: i4i Ltd v Microsoft Corp (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (Washington State… [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 5:38 am
Described in depth in Section V, it also emerges from the multi-disciplinary framework of social healing through justice Professor Yamamoto has been developing for guiding and assessing practical reconciliation initiatives. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 5:43 am
Something like what we want – a rigorous, disciplined approach to warning adequacy – happened in Becker v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 12:41 pm
” These heartening developments, born of both majoritarian politics and counter-majoritarian judicial action, point the way to a brighter future for many gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals and couples. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 3:30 am
David Allen Green, The Law and Policy Blog: The secularisation of the United Kingdom state: concluding, “Let us put disestablishment off to another year. [read post]
