Search for: "State v. Brown" Results 81 - 100 of 9,197
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2024, 10:43 am by Emma Babler
People of color are disproportionately prosecuted for gun crimes, which, in part, prompted the Black Public Defenders Amicus Brief in support of expanding gun rights in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm by Samantha Heavner
Judge Ada Brown, of the Northern District of Texas, determined that the FTC lacked the statutory authority to impose such a broad prohibition. [read post]
” The likelihood of such appeal is questionable, however, particularly in light of the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 3:42 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
Brown of the Northern District of Texas had stated an intent to issue a merits decision on or before Aug. 31, and I had guessed it might go down to the wire. [read post]
” The likelihood of such appeal is questionable, however, particularly in light of the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 11:15 am by Daniel R. Levy, Carolyn O. Boucek
Judge Brown set the tone for her decision by quoting the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Loper Bright Enters. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 4:36 pm
  (Applause.)Let me ask you: Are you ready to elect Kamala Harris and Tim Walz president and vice president of the United States? [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 7:58 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
The future of the FTC’s rule is quickly coming to a head as Judge Brown’s decision on the merits in the Ryan, LLC v. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 12:30 pm by Guest Blogger
But then, even though the Supreme Court finally approved a state relief measure for those who couldn’t pay their mortgages in Home Building and Loan Association v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 10:23 am by Arkady Itkin
Under the California Supreme Court case Brown v Superior Court (1984) case, the special provisions of this FEHA venue law “control in cases involving FEHA claims joined with non-FEHA claims arising from the same facts. [read post]