Search for: "State v. Bruno" Results 81 - 100 of 238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2017, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A claim of professional malpractice requires proof that there was a departure from the accepted standards of practice and that the departure was a proximate cause of the injury (see Bruno v Trus Joist a Weyerhaeuser Bus., 87 AD3d 670, 672; Kung v Zheng, 73 AD3d 862, 863; Estate of Burke v Repetti & Co., 255 AD2d 483). [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 4:25 am by Lisa Rodgers
The Court of Appeal disagreed, stating that the important consideration was not the sufficient British connection between the employer and employee for the purposes of employment law, but rather the connection between the co-workers. [read post]
23 May 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for the Chicago Tribune, Robert Bruno argues that a ruling for the petitioner in Janus v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:32 am by Mike Scarcella
Super-Sized: The Washington Post examines the closely watched sex discrimination class action Wal-Mart v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:21 am
 The office of the state public defender has reportedly committed an additional $25,000. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
  It seems that the complete duplication may be “excessive”, in light of the quantity, quality and importance of the material used (Blanch v Koons).Bruno is unimpressed with the dumb Starbucks crownhe has to wear to make his significant human happyIn relation to market effects, would the hundreds of people queuing up for Dumb Starbucks have alternately visited the original coffee retailer that day? [read post]