Search for: "State v. Butterfly"
Results 81 - 90
of 90
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2018, 1:02 pm
BF (Butterfly) Labs, Inc., et al., No. 4:14-cv-815 (W.D. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm
The GreatestAs defense counsel appreciate, PMA preemption post-Riegel floats like a butterfly and stings like a bee. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court is as poised as it has been at any time since 1973 to overturn Roe v. [read post]
12 Nov 2006, 11:41 am
Would we be in this national lose-lose situation without the Court's two Bush v. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: USPTO upholds one of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF’s) human stem cell patents (decisions are pending on two other patents): (IPKat), (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), English High Court rules Qualcomm’s patents invalid in battle against Nokia: (Philip Brooks), (IPEG), (IP… [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 6:06 am
The Supreme Court’s “Presumptive Immunity” Standard An especially baffling aspect of the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
But not everyone saw the effects of this new technology as benign: some saw the prophesied erosion of state power as an invitation to anarchy, or as opening the door to the very evils that the state power was being deployed to prevent. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
John Reed Stark As I noted in a recent post, on June 8, 2016, the SEC, in what one commentator called “the most significant SEC cybersecurity-related action to date,” announced that Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC had agreed to pay a $1 million penalty to settle charges that as a result of its alleged failure to adopt written policies and procedures reasonably designed to protect customer data, some customer information was hacked and offered for sale online. [read post]
