Search for: "State v. C. R. C."
Results 81 - 100
of 13,648
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2021, 1:53 am
Sanofi (Case C-443/12) and Actavis v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
The House of Lords had previously thought that the scheme was lawful, in R (S) v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police [2004] 1 WLR 2196. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The Supreme Court in R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 57 held by a 3:2 majority that the blanket requirement that all applicants for a student loan have “indefinite leave to remain” is discriminatory and must be amended by the Government. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
See State of Tennessee v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 2:00 am
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions,heard 29-30 April. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
This post concludes and summarizes our coverage of the case United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 3:21 am
R. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 10:16 am
Co. of Canada v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 10:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 8:28 am
C. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 1:51 am
R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, R (Heathrow Hub Limited & Anor) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, and R (Buckinghamshire County Council & Ors) v The Secretary of State for Transport, heard 15 – 16 October 2013. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 March 2014. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 9:00 am
Apparently, Douglas Miller sued the state Senate for discrimination, harassment and retaliation after he was fired from a job in Berryhill's district office in Modesto in 2013 (Miller v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 7:53 am
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions,heard 29-30 April. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
Nicholas R. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:58 am
R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 March 2014. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 2:14 am
Oguz v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Centre for Advice on Individual Rights in Europe intervening) C-186/10; [2011] WLR (D) 259 “Article 41(1) of the Additional Protocol, signed on 23 November 1970 at Brussels and concluded, approved and confirmed on behalf of the Community by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2760/72 (OJ 1973 C 113 p17), had to be interpreted as meaning that it could be relied on by a Turkish national who,… [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:56 am
The anatomy of a disputed claim for GML §207-c benefitsParker v Village of Johnson City, 2010 NY Slip Op 50957(U), Decided on May 26, 2010, Supreme Court, Broome County, Ferris D. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 7:51 am
In State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 6:50 am
Case C- 191/18, KN v Minister for Justice and Equality, is not about PIL; the questions referred to the CJ on March 16, actually relate to the European Arrest warrant (and Brexit). [read post]
