Search for: "State v. Cartier"
Results 81 - 100
of 148
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
" A spot of sparring in the States. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
NVidia v Hardware Labs [2016] EWHC 3135(December 2016)This was the exam question posed here. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Same parties https://t.co/IcAbJPIn9T -> Court of Appeal must maintain brand owners' right to obtain website blocking orders, says expert https://t.co/siuDX2MrcZ -> Big Data: Legal Aspects from a Canadian Perspective https://t.co/5tew1eibMY -> Galloway v Frazer, Google Inc (YouTube) and Ors, the Kitchen Sink against the “Internet https://t.co/JEpcS4nphd -> Intellectual Property Law in Canada » CASL Enforcement https://t.co/pZaimDgNvM -> EU General Court… [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 2:24 pm
A week before the Federal Circuit's appellate hearing on Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 10:52 am
Since an action for rectification and removal is indivisible it cannot be brought in each Member State in which the information is or was accessible.] [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:38 am
Applicant Jen Chi sought to register its mark (right) within Class 25, and the application was opposed by Guess.Asia Correspondent Tian Lu looks at the EU's Protected Designations of Origin (PDOs) in Court of Justice: use of figurative signs may constitute unlawful evocation of a PDO.Events and Other NewsKatfriend Andrea Leonelli reports on the AIPPI event, where important cases such as Cartier v BT and Sky v SkyKick were discussed. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 1:00 am
Cartier International AG & Ors v British Telecommunications Plc & Anor, heard 30 Jan 2018. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm
United States Summer Zervos’ defamation claim [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 9:03 am
A date for judgment is not yet available. ● Site blocking orders 2014 saw the most significant UK site blocking case since Newzbin2, Cartier v BSkyB. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 1:00 am
Cartier International AG & Ors v British Telecommunications Plc & Anor, heard 30 Jan 2018. [read post]
22 May 2017, 4:09 pm
The effect of Article 15 can be seen in the ECJ decisions of SABAM v Scarlet and SABAM v Netlog prohibiting content filtering injunctions, and in Arnold J’s Cartier judgment itself: “If ISPs could be required to block websites without having actual knowledge of infringing activity, that would be tantamount to a general obligation to monitor. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:51 pm
Cartier, Inc., 486 U. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 2:47 pm
Supreme Court's decision in K Mart Corp. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 1:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 9:31 am
Even more, the Court – similarly as the Austrian Supreme Court in UPC Telekabel and the English High Court in Cartier v Sky – recognized that the availability of this remedy is compulsory under Art. 8(3) InfoSoc Directive. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
A weekly (or thereabouts) collection of news about counterfeits, fakes, knockoffs, replicas, imitations, and the culture of copying in general around the globe: Four horsemen: Ralph Lauren sends C&D to PolistasConflict of laws: eBay won't change practices despite German court mandateOriginal Rolex v. eBay court decision (in German)Surrender monkey business: Likelihood of Confusion reportsPen pals: How LVMH prefers to handle fakes on eBay (HT:… [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:28 am
., Serial No. 77432339 [Refusal to register KOOLER KIOSK for "Water cooler attachment for storing, holding and displaying articles" on the alternative grounds of mere descriptiveness or deceptive misdescriptiveness under Section 2(e)(1)].May 6, 2010 - 10 AM: In re Florida State University Credit Union , Serial No. 77415033 [Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal to register COLLEGIATE COMMUNITY FINANCIAL for "credit union services"].May 11, 2010 - 2 PM: In re DAP… [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 9:31 am
Even more, the Court – similarly as the Austrian Supreme Court in UPC Telekabel and the English High Court in Cartier v Sky – recognized that the availability of this remedy is compulsory under Art. 8(3) InfoSoc Directive. [read post]
