Search for: "State v. Chestnut"
Results 81 - 100
of 241
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2013, 6:04 am
Again, that old chestnut, "this would make an interesting article, but it really isn't a book" got tossed around (I also tried to sell an article about the case, but that didn't work either). [read post]
Suit By Gay Worker Shows Modern Trends: "Cat's Paw" Liability And "Gender Stereotype" Discrimination
4 Sep 2012, 9:27 am
In Koren v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 6:14 am
Hempstead, 69 NY2d 406, 409-410, 413-414; Matter of Village of Chestnut Ridge v Town of Ramapo, 45 AD3d 74, 89-90; Matter of Ontario Hgts. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 6:14 am
Hempstead, 69 NY2d 406, 409-410, 413-414; Matter of Village of Chestnut Ridge v Town of Ramapo, 45 AD3d 74, 89-90; Matter of Ontario Hgts. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 8:34 am
United States) 1984 ICJ 169, 1986 ICJ 14 (4) Filartiga v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 9:33 am
Netscape and ProCD v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:55 am
By Michael TarrantYanmar American Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:35 am
If there is any doubt as to the availability of a defense, it should not be dismissed.Case: Chestnut Realty Corp. v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:43 pm
United States, 11-9711, Jackson v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:20 am
Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:57 pm
In re Chestnut Energy Partners, Inc., 300 S.W.3d 386, 397 (Tex. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:57 pm
In re Chestnut Energy Partners, Inc., 300 S.W.3d 386, 397 (Tex. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 11:40 am
From page five (citations omitted): This is all a dreadful muddle, for which we appellate judges must accept some blame because doctrine stated as metaphor, such as the “cat’s paw” theory of liability, which we introduced into employment discrimination law in Shager v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:24 am
Sullivan v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:23 pm
No matter what Contracts casebook one uses to teach, there are a bunch of well-established chestnuts that everyone knows: Hadley v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:30 am
Such elements, he stated (at [81]) were 'not merely a generic story about a disabled football fan but are recognisable as part of the particular story told in Flipper’s Side. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 4:29 pm
" United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 8:10 am
I fear that this may be the case with the opposition between internal v. external outcasting because that distinction requires insiders and outsiders and, as a result, implies different legal orders in order to make sense. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 9:50 am
The lawyers in Elouise Cobell v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:57 am
(We were doing a Joey Chestnut imitation.) [read post]
