Search for: "State v. Chun"
Results 81 - 100
of 143
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2011, 7:42 am
I represented the lead defendant in the case that decided the reliability of this machine, State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 3:43 am
[State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 2:28 pm
In Malilia v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:33 am
The judge next concluded that even if he were to reach the merits of the issue, he would have determined that the breathalyzer source code is scientifically reliable, in part relying on the decision of the New Jersey Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 5:43 am
Chun, 194 N.J. 54, 88-89 (2008); State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:21 am
Lord Phillips also re-named the defence as “honest comment” (as opposed to Court of Appeal in BCA v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350, which favoured “honest opinion” [35]) and called on the Law Commission to consider and review the present state of the defence. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 4:13 pm
The elements of the defence of fair comment had been set out by Lord Nicholls in the Hong Kong case of Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng [2001] EMLR 777. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm
Lord Phillips also re-named the defence as “honest comment” (as opposed to Court of Appeal in BCA v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350, which favoured “honest opinion” [35]) and called on the Law Commission to consider and review the present state of the defence. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 7:46 am
See United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:19 pm
In a case called State v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 6:04 pm
I represented the lead defendant in State v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:46 am
State v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 7:37 am
That order in State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 9:50 am
I also explained my involvement in State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 10:52 am
State v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 8:25 am
Adams, 194 N.J. 186, 203 (2008)); accord State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am
Pill LJ pointed out that, in an analysis of the law of fair comment in the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal case of Tse Wai Chun Pau v Albert Cheng ([2001] EMLR 31), Lord Nicholls had said “the comment must explicitly or implicitly indicate, at least in general terms, what are the facts on which the comment is being made. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:35 pm
State v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:37 am
In State v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 7:33 am
Not long ago a New Jersey appellate court made its decision in the case of STATE v. [read post]
