Search for: "State v. Clausing"
Results 81 - 100
of 28,604
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2024, 1:33 pm
On April 11, 2024, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Kayode v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm
Last year, in a high-profile case (and opinion), a Ninth Circuit panel held that A.B. 5 -- passed essentially to try to classify Uber and Lyft drivers as employees rather than independent contractors (something that Proposition 22 later reversed) -- was likely unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause, despite the fact that the standard of review was rational basis. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 8:07 am
Philadelphia, Tax Review Board, involving the Constitution’s commerce clause and whether and how states should provide credit for a taxpayer’s out-of-state tax liability. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:09 am
In Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
Circuit’s decision in Blassingame v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 9:12 am
In the intricate legal dispute involving Pizza Hut LLC v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 8:55 am
The Supreme Court's 2022 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 7:30 am
In McCulloch v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm
Facebook v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:58 pm
This decision was brought to the Court as a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Carl v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:40 pm
” Nat’l Petroleum Ref’rs Ass’n v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:30 am
Under this approach, Gibbons v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 4:05 am
Mary Catholic Parish in Littleton v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 4:05 pm
United States and Free Exercise after Fulton (75 ALA. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:30 am
Chief Justice John Marshall used this approach in McCulloch v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 6:36 am
Force majeure clauses relieve a party from its obligation to perform under a contract on the occurrence of a specific event or state of affairs. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm
These are, for instance, the non-discrimination clause in Article 19 TFEU, or Article 81(3) TFEU as regards aspects of family law with cross-border implications. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:26 pm
In Trump v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 4:49 pm
First, following Curistan v Times Newspapers [2009] QB 231, qualified privilege operates so that the relevant privileged words are ignored for defamation purposes, at least as far as meaning is concerned, except insofar as they provide context for non-privileged words [56]. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 11:59 am
State-by-state reform efforts cannot curb exclusionary zoning nationwide, at one fell swoop. [read post]
