Search for: "State v. Code"
Results 81 - 100
of 27,092
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2024, 6:00 am
Stated differently, an accident is "a sudden, unexpected event that was not a risk inherent in the work performed" (Matter of Kowal v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 1124, 1125 [2018]; Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, 678, 682, 684-685 [2018]). [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:00 am
Stated differently, an accident is "a sudden, unexpected event that was not a risk inherent in the work performed" (Matter of Kowal v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 1124, 1125 [2018]; Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, 678, 682, 684-685 [2018]). [read post]
24 May 2024, 3:58 am
Grasso v Guarino 2024 NY Slip Op 02692 Decided on May 15, 2024Appellate Division, Second Department illustrates the quanta of allegations necessary to state a cause of action in Judiciary Law 487 claims. [read post]
23 May 2024, 9:01 pm
”It is hard to counter that view when Justices like Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito flaunt their political sympathies or when the Court trashed its own precedents on the way to overturning Roe v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 4:54 pm
v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:28 am
From Tuesday's decision in Robertson v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 3:01 am
Fisher v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 12:15 am
In Mahban v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:20 am
., LLC v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 8:30 am
Oklahoma; Writ of Habeas Corpus) United States v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Retirement Investors For purposes of the new test, the Final Rule has added a new definition for the recipients of investment advice: Term Definition Retirement Investor a plan, plan participant or beneficiary, IRA, IRA owner or beneficiary, plan fiduciary within the meaning of ERISA section (3)(21)(A)(i) or (iii) Code section 4975(e)(3)(A) or (C) with respect to the plan, or an IRA fiduciary within the meaning of Code section 4975(e)(3)(A) or (C) with respect to the IRA. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Code Title IV states that “No disrespect should be shown to the flag of the United States of America. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
For instance in Tremblay et al. v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
See Savage v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
Spectrum Security Services Inc., resolving a split of authority in California state and federal courts whether there is a “good faith” defense to claims seeking statutory penalties under Labor Code Section 226. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
Spectrum Security Services Inc., resolving a split of authority in California state and federal courts whether there is a “good faith” defense to claims seeking statutory penalties under Labor Code Section 226. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
Spectrum Security Services Inc., resolving a split of authority in California state and federal courts whether there is a “good faith” defense to claims seeking statutory penalties under Labor Code Section 226. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
Spectrum Security Services Inc., resolving a split of authority in California state and federal courts whether there is a “good faith” defense to claims seeking statutory penalties under Labor Code Section 226. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
Spectrum Security Services Inc., resolving a split of authority in California state and federal courts whether there is a “good faith” defense to claims seeking statutory penalties under Labor Code Section 226. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
Spectrum Security Services Inc., resolving a split of authority in California state and federal courts whether there is a “good faith” defense to claims seeking statutory penalties under Labor Code Section 226. [read post]