Search for: "State v. Constable"
Results 81 - 100
of 513
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2020, 2:16 pm
They say they’re not laying off any officers, so the move could (v slightly) help with staffing issues. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm
The decision in R (Miller) v (1) The College of Policing, and (2) The Chief Constable of Humberside [2020] EWHC 225 (Admin) tackles police recording, retention and dissemination of information about individuals in relation to “non-crime” hate incidents. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 5:57 am
I n September 2019, in R (Bridges) v The Chief Constable of South Wales, the High Court ruled that the use of FRT by South Wales Police was, in those specific instances, lawful (the case was brought by Ed Bridges, a member of the public, who believed his image had been captured on FRT from a police van whilst he was shopping in Cardiff city centre). [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:28 am
And further dispute arose between Sheeran's song 'Photograph' (also written by the first and third claimants; Sheeran and McDaid) and a song called 'Amazing', following which there was a settlement agreement and 35% of the PRS royalties now go to the writers of 'Amazing'.Naturally, the Claimants sought to strike out these allegations, which came before Deputy Master Jefferis on 4 June 2019 on the basis that similar fact evidence is only admissible in civil… [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 2:51 am
R ((DN (Rwanda)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7 October 2019 and 8 October 2019 . [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Court of Appeal have granted permission to appeal in the facial recognition technology case of Bridges v Chief Constable of South Wales Police. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 6:16 am
The ICO’s investigation was triggered by the recent UK High Court decision in R (Bridges) v The Chief Constable of South Wales (see our previous blog post here), where the court held that the use of facial recognition technology by the South Wales Police Force (“SWP”) was lawful. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
Case Law: R (Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police: The use of facial recognition software by the police is lawful – Suneet Sharma. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:06 am
R (on the application of Edward Bridges) v The Chief Constable of South Wales [2019] EWHC 2341 (Admin) Case Note Introduction In Bridges, an application for judicial review, the UK High Court (Lord Justice Haddon-Cave and Mr. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 3:15 am
– ProQuest https://t.co/PtSVAWlJGx 2019-09-03 A Tale of Two Legal Regimes: An Empirical Investigation into How Copyright Law Shapes Online Service Providers’ Pra… https://t.co/w01YoW2Vw5 2019-09-03 RT @BBCTech: 'Deepfake' app causes fraud and privacy fears in China https://t.co/Ov1haYwxi6 2019-09-04 RT @AnnCavoukian: Fraudsters deepfake CEO's voice to trick manager into transferring $243,000 https://t.co/ADmfKQEZT6 2019-09-04 Google target of new U.S. antitrust… [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:14 am
Applying Hellewell v Chief Constable of Derbyshire [1995] 1 WLR 804 at 810F the Court considered that such use was reasonable. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:29 pm
The Administrative Court will give judgment in the facial recognition case of The Queen (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police on 4 September 2019. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 8:29 am
By contrast, as the Court of Appeal noted at para 42, in many of the leading cases the treatment in itself caused disadvantage: in Clark v Novacold Ltd [1999] ICR 951 the claimant was dismissed; in Lewisham London Borough Council v Malcolm [2008] UKHL the claim was evicted; and in Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] ICR 337 the claimant chief inspector had part of her duties as a manager removed. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 1:43 pm
” A civil lawsuit was filed (Smith v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:01 am
Bianchi v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
That was rejected by the Supreme Court’s majority as being based upon a misreading of earlier authorities, in particular R (T) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police [2015] AC 49. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Up until this case, that position had support in domestic law (see AL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 1127; R (Hooper) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 29, [2006] 1 All ER 487; and R (S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 4 All ER 193). [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm
The same blog has a post about the case of R (Segalov) v Chief Constable of Sussex Police & Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police [2018] EWHC 3187 (Admin) entitled “It’s My Party and I’ll Cry/Sue for Accreditation if I Want To! [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 2:00 pm
See Justice v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm
United States The internet cases blog has covered the case of Benson v. [read post]
