Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 81 - 100
of 4,098
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2024, 3:45 am
This appeal by plaintiffs ensued. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm
I have had no role in either case. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:30 am
(Young v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:31 am
A case I handled for the defendant a couple of years ago involvi [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:58 am
Hooper, that the Supreme Court had recognized claims of implied bias and that there was a division among the federal courts of appeals on the question. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:00 am
It is unanimous in affirming the Appellate Division’s rejection of Trump’s state law grounds for appeal. [read post]
23 May 2024, 6:00 am
Matter of Timperio v Bronx-Lebanon Hosp. 2024 NY Slip Op 02723 Decided on May 16, 2024 Court of Appeals Halligan Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
23 May 2024, 6:00 am
Matter of Timperio v Bronx-Lebanon Hosp. 2024 NY Slip Op 02723 Decided on May 16, 2024 Court of Appeals Halligan Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
22 May 2024, 3:00 am
So held the North Carolina Court of Appeals in State v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:15 am
This is the second decision in which access to documents has been granted under Rule 262.1(b), following the decision of the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division to grant access to documents in Ocado v AutoStore, which was upheld by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:36 pm
The state courts upheld this mandate as a neutral law under Employment Division v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 2:45 am
On 13 May 2024, the UPC Court of Appeal (CoA) upheld the Munich Local Division’s decision in SES v Hanshow (UPC_CoA_1/2024) that a preliminary injunction should be refused on the basis that there was not sufficient certainty that certain models of Hanshow’s electronic label products infringe SES’ patent. [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Newport Steel Corp. and embraced by the Supreme Court in Blue Chip Stamps v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:26 am
So, I was pleased to debut my appearance here with what seemed to be an interesting case out of the Manhattan Commercial Division—Cline v Grodin, et al., Index No. 654095/2022—concerning an action commenced by a limited partner of a Delaware limited partnership alleging that the general partner (an LLC whose membership consists of the other two individual limited partners in the partnership) improperly distributed profits to those two limited partners,… [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:50 am
Thus, in Auerbach v Bennett (47 NY2d 619 [1979]), New York’s highest court held that courts have the power in shareholder derivative litigation to grant unnamed interested shareholders leave to intervene – even for the first time on appeal. [read post]
12 May 2024, 7:37 am
Carpin v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 6:55 am
European Court of Human RightsTuskia v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:51 am
”The Court discretion could of course lead to different approaches by different divisions but this UPCKat has seen quite a consistent approach so far. [read post]