Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 81 - 100
of 4,034
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2024, 3:17 pm
The Lazar Case Lazar v Mor, decided last month by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrea Masley, involved facts somewhat similar to those in Meregalli. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Petitioner appealed the Supreme Court's action.Citing Matter of Washington Post Co. v New York State Ins. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Petitioner appealed the Supreme Court's action.Citing Matter of Washington Post Co. v New York State Ins. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:46 am
With the amount of money at stake, I can imagine a swiftly perfected appeal in Haruvi. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:13 pm
A recent New York Appellate Division, First Department case—Marte v Tishman Constr. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
Circuit Court of Appeals, which rejected some of Illumina’s constitutional claims, left others for the U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 6:31 am
The Court of Appeals of Washington examined this issue in State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:50 am
Yet allowing a judicial precedent to foreclose an agency from interpreting an ambiguous statute, as the Court of Appeals assumed it could, would allow a court’s interpretation to override an agency’s. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 5:58 pm
Tax Appeals Trib., 1 NY3d 85 (2003). [3] 20 NYCRR 132.18(a). [4] See TSB-M-06(5)I (May 15, 2006). [5] S. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 5:58 pm
Nov. 30, 2023). [1] 20 NYCRR 132.18(a). [2] Zelinsky v Tax Appeals Trib., 1 NY3d 85 (2003). [3] 20 NYCRR 132.18(a). [4] See TSB-M-06(5)I (May 15, 2006). [5] S. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 2:49 am
The Board of Appeal concluded that "[i]t is a general and overarching objective, and as such also a 'requirement' of the Convention, that authorities, courts and the public interpreting the claims at a later stage should, as far as possible, arrive at the same understanding of the claimed subject-matter as the EPO bodies deciding on the patentability of the same subject-matter. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court held oral arguments in a case that many experts expect to affect the 1984 case Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 8:10 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
In response to PEF's appealing the Supreme Court's ruling, the Appellate Division affirmed the lower court's decision. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
In response to PEF's appealing the Supreme Court's ruling, the Appellate Division affirmed the lower court's decision. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Supreme Court granted the Defendants' motions, and Plaintiff appealed. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Supreme Court granted the Defendants' motions, and Plaintiff appealed. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 10:03 am
Moreno and 2d District Court of Appeal Division 4 Presiding Justice Brian S. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
As Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote for a plurality in Hamdi v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. [read post]