Search for: "State v. Coven"
Results 81 - 100
of 3,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm
Sunil V. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 6:40 am
Indeed, where that occurs the covenant may not be enforceable, as the Fifth Circuit held earlier this year in Rouses Enterprises, LLC v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 12:17 pm
In Cardoni et al. v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 2:49 pm
Fifield v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:58 am
However, what constitutes adequate consideration for a restrictive covenant, especially a non-compete provision, varies from state to state. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:29 am
Agency v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 9:50 am
” Assurance Data, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:11 pm
Kraemer, the 1948 decision in which the Supreme Court held that it was unconstitutional for state courts to enforce racially restrictive covenants. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 9:29 am
See e.g., Analog Devices v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 7:12 pm
Oklahoma recently passed a new law (Senate Bill 1031) that clarifies the enforceability of non-solicitation of employee covenants within the state. [read post]
30 May 2013, 7:12 pm
Oklahoma recently passed a new law (Senate Bill 1031) that clarifies the enforceability of non-solicitation of employee covenants within the state. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:26 am
Given the current state of Delaware jurisprudence on restrictive covenants, employers must carefully consider any restraints on employee mobility. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:56 am
In a case of first impression, the Pennsylvania Superior Court (one of Pennsylvania’s two state appellate courts) recently issued a ruling in Socko v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 9:29 am
Maaco Franchisor SPV, LLC v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 11:52 am
As we noted in a blog post last July, to our knowledge, Fifield is the first Illinois state court decision to hold that an offer of employment by itself is not sufficient consideration for a restrictive covenant. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:46 pm
In Dieckman v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:30 am
It's hard to get an injunction enforcing a covenant not to compete that has a nationwide territory, but the Plaintiff was successful at that in the Middle District's decision last week in Philips Electronics North America Corp. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 9:22 am
The adequacy of the consideration for a covenant not to compete entered into after the commencement of employment was the issue in Hejl v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 6:10 pm
Contracts -- Employment -- Noncompetition covenant -- Enforcement -- Attorney's fees -- Employer who had restrictive covenant with employees cannot recover its attorney's fees from a third party who knowingly aided and abetted the employees' violation of the restrictive covenant -- Conflict certified -- Attorney's fees could not be awarded as matter of equity -- To extent plaintiff sought to recover attorney's fees under section 542.335(1)(k), no… [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 11:58 am
Zwanenberg Food Group (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
