Search for: "State v. Crowley" Results 81 - 100 of 142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller,… [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 3:45 pm
Why anyone thinks such a prohibition serves the interests of justice or truthfinding is beyond me.In United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 10:55 am by Clara Spera
But, in an apparent blow to NSA, United States District Court Judge Jeffrey White has denied the Justice Department’s request to suspend legal action in the case of First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:17 am by Quinta Jurecic
Robert Hannigan, Former Director, United Kingdom Government Communications HeadquartersMike Rogers, Commander, US Cyber Command; Director, National Security Agency Moderator: David Ignatius, Associate Editor and Columnist, The Washington Post   That Was ThenMichael Collins, Deputy Assistant Director, East Asia Mission Center, Central Intelligence AgencyBonnie Glaser, Senior Advisor for Asia; Director, China Power Project, Center for Strategic and International StudiesKenichiro Sasae,… [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 11:42 am by Meg Martin
McLean of Crowley Fleck PLLP, Bozeman, Montana.Facts/Discussion: This was an appeal from a summary judgment granted to HKM by the district court. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 4:28 am by Emma Snell
Michael Crowley reports for the New York Times. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:54 am
Crowley, public affairs director for the State Liquor Authority who cited [§128 of] the ABC Law as prohibiting such employments. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:15 am by Big Tent Democrat
Article V of the Convention states that all the protections apply to any captured persons until determination of status by a competent tribunal. [read post]