Search for: "State v. Cruise" Results 81 - 100 of 841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2008, 8:53 pm
In a matter of first impression, the Third Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 9:29 am by Jim Walker
Carnival Corporation, United States District Court Southern District of Florida, Case No. 10-21627-CIV-UNGARO. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 12:13 pm
Being that most cruise ship doctors are from foreign countries, it was very difficult to obtain jurisdiction over their tortious acts in the United States. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 12:00 am
Cruise ship employees' employment contracts are "considered as commercial" under Title 9 of the United States Code. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 9:56 pm by Jim Walker
  Flag states like Bermuda, Bahamas and Panama will never meddle into the cruise lines' business. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 6:21 am by Jim Walker
 The cruise line states that the Silver Explorer should back to its normal schedule of cruises to Antarctica trip on January 31st. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 8:08 am by Jim Walker
Carnival (cruise lines have duty to warn of crimes in ports of call), Johnson v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 12:09 am
The judge dismissed this submission stating that the condition only required the passenger to prove his loss and, in this case, loss had been proved.The judge found in favour of the claimant notwithstanding his acknowledgement that the Policy had been used by the claimant as a means of facilitating the purchase of the Hebridean Princess and retaining the goodwill attached to the cruises operated by HICL.To view the full judgment, please click here. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:17 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
Due to Florida’s geographic location on the coast, the state boasts two of out of the three busiest cruise ship ports in the nation. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 3:30 am by Jim Walker
Supreme Court in Atlantic Sounding Co., Inc., v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 7:15 am by Eugene Volokh
You can read the Complaint in Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]