Search for: "State v. D. J."
Results 81 - 100
of 6,891
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am
Donald J. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Trump (SDNY), YALE J. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:27 am
For more information on SEC v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 2:05 am
The judgment In R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL 15, Lord Nicholls had drawn a distinction at [16] between the two elements of Article 9: there was “a difference between freedom to hold a belief and freedom to express or ‘manifest’ a belief. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:00 pm
State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
While Custodia is subject to state prudential regulation, it is not FDIC-insured or subject to federal prudential regulation and does not have a holding company subject to Federal Reserve oversight. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
V. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
The law is very clear that an agreement to perform unaudited services does not shield an accountant from liability because an accountant must perform all services in accordance with the standard of a reasonable accountant under similar circumstances, which includes reporting fraud that is or should be apparent (see 1136 Tenants’ Corp. v Rothenberg & Co., 36 AD2d 804 [1st Dept 1971], affd 30 NY2d 585 [1972]; see also William Iselin & Co., Inc. v Mann Judd… [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Gooding, Maeve O’Connor, and William D. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Gooding, Maeve O’Connor, and William D. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 4:55 am
Now that Urias v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 1:49 pm
” In R v D(J) the court states that for the charge to be made out, the breach of peace must “flow from the manner in which possession of the real property is taken and not from subsequent events. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 1:19 am
The decision of Joanna Smith J. in Frain & McKinnon v Reeves & Curnock [2023] EWHC 73 (Ch) (at 19), was cited with approval, from which the following relevant principles could be distilled: a. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
Schmid and V. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
Em “A doutrina das semelhanças”, de 1933, Benjamin escreveu: “Sua percepção, em todos os casos, dá-se num relampejar. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:33 pm
28; R. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
J. [read post]
