Search for: "State v. DH"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,037
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2007, 1:51 pm
You can read Voris v DHS here. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 1:41 pm
You've been living in the United States, and the DHS has treated you pretty shabbily (IMHO). [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 7:45 am
DHS (D.C. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 8:23 am
The new element, as Ilya Somin explains, is the declaration of invalidity of a rule prohibiting jurisdictions from restricting communications with DHS and ICE, relying on Murphy v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:07 am
” In October, the state filed suit in federal court in Texas, accusing federal Border Patrol agents of violating state laws when they cut or moved the wire fencing. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 8:18 pm
DHS (D. [read post]
28 May 2024, 9:15 am
Huynh v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:28 am
In its justification for the arrest, the state of Georgia cited the U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 1:12 pm
Nevertheless, the DHS did not immediately remove Benitez-Guillen and F.O., presumably because Benitez-Guillen intended to apply for asylum in the United States. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 8:20 am
Staszak v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 2:00 pm
In striking down a state system of alien registration, the Court in Hines v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 8:35 am
Affirmed.Case Name: IN THE INTEREST OF LB, BO, KO, Minors, STATE OF WYOMING, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY SERVICES v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:55 am
The Supreme Court has decided to review certain elements in United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 2:30 pm
The case below, State of New York et al. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 9:09 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 10:51 am
The Court stated that DHS was in no way required to consider all policy alternatives conceivable. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 9:21 am
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and have been fully approved for resettlement in the United States. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 7:21 pm
Lamb v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 10:43 am
The Court further found, however, that DH Services failed to make even a “prima facie showing that Defendant ‘expected or should reasonably have expected the act to have consequences in the State. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 8:41 pm
Project South v. [read post]
