Search for: "State v. Domino" Results 81 - 100 of 285
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by George Bellas
Supreme Court recently declined a petition for certiorari in Domino’s Pizza v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 12:11 pm by Richard Hunt
As I predicted, the United States Supreme Court denied Domino’s Petition for Certiorari today. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:17 am by Amy Howe
” The petitions for review that the Supreme Court denied today included: Domino’s Pizza v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:19 pm by Jason Kelley
EFF’s annual Pioneer Awards ceremony celebrates individuals and groups who have made outstanding contributions to freedom and innovation on the electronic frontier. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 4:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiff alleged that the driver of the offending vehicle was working for Domino’s Pizza, LLC (hereinafter Domino’s), making a pizza delivery at the time of the subject accident, and that the defendants were negligent in failing to timely commence an action against Dominos. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:00 am by Legal Talk Network
Now, Domino’s is petitioning the Supreme Court of the United States to hear the case. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:00 am by zbrown
Now, Domino’s is petitioning the Supreme Court of the United States to hear the case. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 6:19 am by Richard Hunt
‡ * See our blog, “ADA and the Internet – 9th Circuit overrules Robles v Dominos” ** The word chosen by Domino’s in its brief. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:03 pm by Jeffrey M. Goldstein
In so concluding, the Court ruled that Blanton, the plaintiff employee of a Domino’s franchisee, had adequately pled that Domino’s used the franchise agreements to orchestrate a conspiracy among their franchisees to not compete for labor; Blanton says that the no-hire provision is evidence of that conspiracy and violates the Sherman Antitrust Act because it unreasonably restrains competition for Domino’s franchise employees and depresses employee wages,… [read post]
3 May 2019, 6:51 am by Joy Waltemath
The district court recognized that “no binding decision ha[d] addressed the standard applicable to determining whether a franchisor is an employer of a franchisee,” and “in the absence of controlling authority” it applied the standard from Martinez v Combs, with the gloss of Patterson v Domino’s Pizza, LLC . [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Amanda Pickens Nitto
March 12, 2019) (purported collective and class action brought under FLSA and state wage and hour laws alleging Domino’s Pizza franchise owner failed to adequately reimburse delivery drivers for their delivery-related expenses) Alderman v. [read post]