Search for: "State v. Donald Rogers" Results 81 - 100 of 228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
The Supreme Court seems poised to reverse Colorado’s decision to exclude Donald Trump from its Republican presidential primary ballot on grounds other than that Trump did not take the right kind of oath to support the Constitution. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 4:42 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: In an op-ed in The Washington Examiner, Roger Pilon weighs in on Murr v. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 9:44 am by Katherine Pompilio
Benjamin Wittes analyzed Judge David Carter’s March 28 opinion on Donald Trump and John Eastman in Eastman v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:57 pm by Hyemin Han
  Stewart Baker sat down with Alan Rozenshtein and Adam Candeub for a deep dive of the NetChoice v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:53 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Kelly paid $17,000 to Darrell Edmond Rogers, a/k/a Donald Davis, to purchase a vehicle that Rogers claimed to be a 1991 Nissan 300ZX. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 9:02 pm by Cary Coglianese
They alleged that high-level political pressure has led federal prosecutors to engage in selective antitrust investigations and to move for leniency for Roger Stone, a longtime friend and aide of President Donald J. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 3:23 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Circuit, about which the NYT writes: At least two climate cases are pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kevin
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco:  Michael M ____ v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am by INFORRM
Sullivan Ohio State Law Journal, Forthcoming, Roger Williams Univ. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 7:11 am by Ben Allen
  The District Court denied his motion, finding that the warrant was supported by probable cause, and, even if it was not so supported, the Leon good faith exception applied.In United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
In the Barnett/Blackman constitutional law casebook, we included this introduction to United States v. [read post]