Search for: "State v. Drummond" Results 81 - 100 of 155
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2012, 8:00 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
These issues are explored in Labor and Employment Law in Indian Country, jointly published by Drummond Woodsum and the Native American Rights Fund. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 7:56 pm
Begging the question, does the next age in software protection belong to copyright (see Apple v Psystar, Oracle v Google)? [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
In the courts of appeals… In State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:36 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Drummond 13-496Issue: Whether the Sixth Circuit violated the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act by holding that “some form” of Waller v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Drummond 13-496Issue: Whether the Sixth Circuit violated the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act by holding that “some form” of Waller v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 12:00 am
Lusignan, The Clause Less Taken: Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
In January of this year when the US Supreme Court agreed to hear the case Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:29 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The defendant supports his position on the rulings made in Kent v United States and People v Drummond. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The Medical Board's determination is conclusive if it is supported by some credible evidence and is not arbitrary or capricious" (Matter of Russell v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 155 AD3d at 1046 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Drummond v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 98 AD3d 1116, 1117). [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The Medical Board's determination is conclusive if it is supported by some credible evidence and is not arbitrary or capricious" (Matter of Russell v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 155 AD3d at 1046 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Drummond v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 98 AD3d 1116, 1117). [read post]