Search for: "State v. E. D."
Results 81 - 100
of 10,433
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 11:16 am
" United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am
Trial in The People of the State of New York vs. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Trump, supra, 928 F. 3d at 236, focusing on whether the social media site functions as a “tool of governance” “swathe[d] in the trappings of [the official’s] office,” see, Davison v. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:35 am
Lottery offences are covered under s. 206, 207, 207.1 and 209 of the Criminal Code, found in Part VII. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:20 am
§ 1881a(f)(2)(C), (D). [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:26 am
The Supreme Court’s Muldrow v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm
My thinking, from my e-mail to the PolitiFact writer (which was largely quoted in the post): [1.] [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:00 pm
State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:41 am
Yesterday in my conflict of laws class I taught South Dakota v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
V. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:33 pm
These proposed rules come in response to the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:11 am
That the risk of the petitioner repeating the act of operating a motor vehicle while impaired by, or under the influence of, alcohol or controlled substances or a combination of alcohol and a controlled substance or repeating any other offense listed in section 303(1)(d), (e), or (f) or (2)(c), (d), (e), or (f) of the act is a low or minimal risk. iv. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 1:55 pm
This is authorized as a secondary offence listed under s. 487.04 (c), (d) or (e), and the DNA order can be authorized regardless of if the Crown proceeds summarily or by indictment. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:05 am
Mallory v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 1:19 am
The Code of Practice states: “[2]. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 2:01 pm
In the old days, we'd know full well when those 30 days started running: from the filing date (i.e., delivery to the Clerk). [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:21 am
In Nigeria, the recent judgment delivered by the Federal High Court in the case of Incorporated Trustees of Laws and Rights Awareness Initiative v Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) sheds light on this complex relationship between data privacy and the interests of the state. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 3:02 am
Also, see Contract Services Employee Trust v. [read post]
