Search for: "State v. Eis" Results 81 - 100 of 536
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2011, 1:25 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 5:33 pm
 Shout out to Jeff DeSousa, PD appeals, who just won Knight v State. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 11:15 am by WIMS
An additional point in the Corps's favor is that none of the federal or state agencies the Corps consulted opposed the project or the Corps's analysis. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 12:39 pm by WIMS
Subsequently, the Service issued a statement to oil and gas companies operating in the forest, stating that no new drilling would be authorized until the forest-wide EIS was completed. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 8:21 am
This week the Appellate Division, First Department (In re Develop Don't Destroy (Brooklyn) v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 8:21 am
This week the Appellate Division, First Department (In re Develop Don't Destroy (Brooklyn) v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 1:03 pm
 The courts have rarely deferred to agency expertise and discretion.In Umberger v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 1:03 pm
 The courts have rarely deferred to agency expertise and discretion.In Umberger v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 3:29 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  A joint EIS/EIR (EIR) was prepared by federal lead agency Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the United States Forest Service (USFS), and state lead agency Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District (Air District). [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 1:55 pm by WIMS
This document sets out three options for the Corps to meet its obligations under section 404: (1) seek an exemption pursuant to section 404(r) as part of the authorization process; (2) obtain a state water quality certification pursuant to section 401; or (3) seek an exemption under section 404(r) after authorization by submitting an EIS to Congress. [read post]