Search for: "State v. Eure" Results 81 - 100 of 231
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2012, 1:37 pm by SJM
The overall award ranged from EUR 58000 to 90000. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
The United States has designated China’s Official Media as Operatives of the Communist State. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:12 pm by SJM
Damages ranging from 5,500-7,500 EUR were awarded. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 8:56 am by Thorsten Bausch
Therefore, what the member states earn in official fees, they will typically lose in corporate or income taxes. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 1:33 am
For a fuller explanation, just click here for the information provided by the EU Publications Office, or here to complain to the EUR-Lex Helpdesk ...Around the weblogs. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:20 am by Milen Hristov
For 2012 the figures are as follows: minimum driver monthly salary of 208 EUR per month. minimum monthly NI and health insurance contributions of 104 EUR per month per driver. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 3:14 am by Kay Marbiah
The EPPO, by contrast, operates directly across member states and is envisaged as an agency that will allow for expedient and direct action. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 8:42 am by Shannon O'Hare
The head of the Spanish state, King Felipe VI, represents the unity and continuity of the state’s institutions. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 3:59 am
In 2012 the TGI Paris (Court of First Instance) dismissed his action, but the following year the Paris Court of Appeal reversed the decision and awarded damages for EUR 50,000.The case eventually reached the French Supreme Court, which in 2015 noted that a fair balance must be struck between copyright protection and the protection of third parties’ freedom of expression, which includes artistic expression. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 1:49 pm by Joshua Cossin
” They also ordered, “that Azerbaijan was to pay the applicant 20,000 euros (EUR) in respect of pecuniary damage and non-pecuniary damage and EUR 5,000 in respect of costs and expenses. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 7:08 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
The case at issue was an opposition to an application of a mark combining the sign “V” with words “Valentino Rudi” by the Italian high end fashion company Valentino. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
The Grand Chamber builds on its earlier case law, integrating the developments which have occurred since the judgment in Guja v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 12:48 pm
Last year, The IPKat reported on the decision of Court of Appeal of the State of California - Second Appellate District, which found that “[T]he right of publicity cannot, consistent with First Amendment, be a right to control the celebrity’s image by censoring disagreeable portrayals. [read post]