Search for: "State v. Felde" Results 81 - 100 of 110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2009, 12:13 pm
United States and Weyhrauch v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
The Texas Supreme Court recently stirred the pot and weighed in on these issues in AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELD, L.L.P. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 12:32 pm by Joe Mullin
When he didn't get paid, Kramer hired Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld to sue DeepNines in New York state Supreme Court. [read post]
Oct. 30, 2009) (per curiam) (restricted appeal of default judgment, error on the face of the record, time of service not noted on return of citation)INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 9:28 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P., 105 S.W.3d 244, 250 (Tex. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 12:58 pm
United States, and on Wednesday, April 29, it announced its decision in Kansas v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:38 am
(International Law Office)   United States US Patents – Decisions BPAI: Merely outputting from a computer suffices under Bilski: Ex parte Dickerson (12:01 Tuesday)   US Copyright How many people have been sued in recording industry’s legal war on file-sharing? [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:13 pm
Ct. 1520 (2008), and the challenge to Indiana's voter ID law in Crawford v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:13 am
Supreme Court rulings, including this month's Quanta Computer Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:23 am
Gerald Goldman, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP, et al., Defendants-Respondents. [read post]