Search for: "State v. Fils" Results 81 - 100 of 118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
FIL Ltd v Fidelis Underwriting [2018] EWHC 1097, High Court of England and Wales (May 2018)The use of FIDELIS for specialty insurance and reinsurance services does not infringe FIDELITY for financial services, holds Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 5:55 am by Christopher Ewell
  The ATS was invoked only rarely in the almost two centuries before the Second Circuit’s now famous 1980 ruling in Filártiga v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm by Marie Louise
(TTABlog) TTAB precedential no. 9: Finding wine and beer related, TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of HB over HB & Crown Design: In re Kysela Pere et Fils, Ltd. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
Supp. 51 (D.D.C. 1973) (holding that the $10,000 jurisdictional amount in controversy requirement then in the statute (it's since been eliminated) was not satisfied); United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 5:46 am by Cristina Mariottini
Recognition yes, transcription no The fil rouge of AG de la Tour’s reasoning was to find a manner to provide recognition for same-sex marriages without overstepping on the Member States’ competences in matters concerning the civil status. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 12:09 am by Vikram Raghavan
Whilst state practice can be found in support (see Filártiga v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:24 pm by Pierre T. Nguyen
., United States Patent and Trademark Office). [read post]